Militaristic hipster
@DaniDeli3
·
167d
The statement is part of a conversation about the professional and financial relationships between journalists and platform owners, specifically in the context of Substack and Twitter. It touches on issues of journalistic integrity, conflicts of interest, and censorship. The tone is explanatory and defensive, aiming to clarify the speaker's position on maintaining independence and avoiding perceived conflicts of interest.
- The statement aims to clarify the speaker's intent to do no harm by avoiding conflicts of interest, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not disclosing sensitive information or engaging in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The speaker engages in constructive criticism by explaining their stance without attacking others. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker acknowledges the public's concern and attempts to correct any misunderstandings. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement reflects an effort to use influence responsibly by maintaining journalistic integrity. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The speaker upholds free speech by choosing a platform that does not censor their work. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.