The statement is part of a conversation about the ethical considerations of a journalist's financial arrangements and independence. It touches upon the broader issue of journalistic integrity and the potential conflicts of interest that can arise when journalists have financial ties to the platforms they cover. The tone is explanatory and defensive, as the speaker is justifying their decision to maintain independence and avoid perceived ethical breaches.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on journalistic ethics and independence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the idea that financial relationships with platforms are not problematic, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker is using their influence to advocate for journalistic independence, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.