Gary Marcus

The statement '@olivia_p_walker @ShiraOvide @washingtonpost not much, that’s the point.' is a succinct response to a question about the special features of a high-priced AI toothbrush. The tone is dismissive, implying that the product may not offer significant benefits despite its high cost. The intent seems to be to contribute to a discussion about the practicality and value of consumer technology products.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm as it is a simple expression of opinion in a consumer-related discussion. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individuals personally. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement is not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement indirectly promotes understanding by suggesting skepticism towards the value of a high-priced consumer product. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement is not a critique that requires acknowledgment or correction of mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not appear to use influence for societal betterment in a significant way, but it does contribute to consumer awareness.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech by participating in a public discussion responsibly. [+1]