In reply to:
Don Azzopardi
@DonAzzopardi
·
378d
The statement is part of a conversation about technology predictions and credibility within the tech industry. It is a defense of the speaker's track record in making accurate predictions and a comparison to other notable figures in the field. The tone is somewhat defensive but also assertive, and the intent seems to be to establish authority and expertise in the subject matter.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by asserting the speaker's credibility without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to assert expertise and authority in the tech industry, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by promoting informed discussions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.