Gary Marcus

The conversation appears to be a discussion about the future of technology, specifically related to the progress and implementation of autonomous vehicles or similar innovations. The tone is speculative and engages in a prediction about technological advancements. The content is focused on the disagreement about the timeline for significant technological milestones.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not seem to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of a mistake being made or corrected in this statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to contribute to a discussion about societal technological progress, which could be seen as for the betterment of society. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]