In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
413d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
413d
The statement '@olivia_p_walker not a fine of fine print' appears to be a brief critique of the disclaimer provided by a company regarding the potential errors of its AI feature. The tone seems to be dismissive or critical of the company's attempt to absolve itself of responsibility through a small disclaimer. The intent is to highlight the insufficiency of the notice in addressing the issue of spreading misinformation. The content is a response to a conversation about an AI chatbot spreading fake news.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm, but it does not actively strive to prevent it either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not necessarily use the platform with full responsibility and integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.