Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the AI community for not listening to warnings about AI development, emphasizing the importance of heeding expert advice.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm and respects privacy and dignity. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of listening to critical voices in AI. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It engages in constructive criticism by pointing out what it perceives as a failure to heed warnings. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It implies the need to acknowledge and correct mistakes by suggesting that ignoring warnings was an oversight. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   It uses influence to advocate for better outcomes in AI development. [+1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It upholds free speech by contributing to the discourse on AI responsibly. [+1]