Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement reports on alleged practices by tech companies in relation to data harvesting for AI development, suggesting potential copyright infringement and ethical concerns. It is critical in tone and implies a need for scrutiny and possibly regulatory action.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather brings attention to potential misconduct. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not targeting individuals but rather corporate practices. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes understanding of the complexities of AI training and data use. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of tech companies' practices. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not acknowledge mistakes as it is a report of others' actions.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about important issues regarding AI and data privacy, which could lead to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.