Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 36

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the state of AI and its societal implications, particularly in terms of bias and the intellectual environment surrounding its development. It critiques the current trend in AI, suggesting a lack of diversity in thought and a potential for built-in bias.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather to critique a field of study.ย [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.ย [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential biases in AI, which could be seen as fostering empathy for those affected by such biases.ย [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI without personal attacks.ย [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to critique and potentially improve the field of AI for the betterment of society.ย [+1]