Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 54
4/7/2024, 4:46:39 PM
X
In reply to:
Ant A
@AntDX316
·
449d
@M_Altarriba @DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus Nuclear WW3 can still happen soon because people have to eliminate others in order to live.

GenAI and ASI can figure out how to work for everyone without the need to accumulate more assets over another, as they would be shared in a proper unified balance, well that is the hope.
M_Altarriba
@M_Altarriba
·
449d
@AntDX316 @DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus What is the logic between this:

"Nuclear WW3 can still happen soon, wiping many things or even everything out."

and this:

"GenAI and ASI has to happen asap." ?
Ant A
@AntDX316
·
449d
@DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus I agree.

People don't understand that it is not possible to lock everything in the way it is now. Nuclear WW3 can still happen soon, wiping many things or even everything out.

GenAI and ASI has to happen asap.
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
449d
@GaryMarcus There is no tragedy.

Deep learning & GenAI represent the greatest advances in human history.

Eventually, something better will emerge, but it will also have downsides & side effects, this is the nature of technological advancement.

Also this is not about you or any of us…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
449d
𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱𝘆.

I have been warning the field of its limitations for decades.

The field has done everything its power to try to dismiss and silence me.

And…

The statement is part of a conversation on social media that discusses the potential impact of General Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on political disputes and the production of misinformation. It is a response to a broader discussion about the implications of GenAI and ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) on global conflicts and asset distribution. The tone of the statement is skeptical, and the intent is to express doubt about the optimistic view that GenAI will solve political disputes. The content suggests that GenAI may instead exacerbate disputes by enabling the spread of misinformation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to caution against potential harm that GenAI could cause, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a potential downside of GenAI, contributing to a more nuanced view of the technology. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the optimistic view of GenAI without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to caution against potential societal harm from GenAI, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to the public discourse on GenAI responsibly and with integrity. [+1]