The statement appears to be a part of a conversation about artificial intelligence, specifically deep learning and GenAI, and their limitations. The speaker, Gary Marcus, expresses a critical view of the field's response to his warnings, suggesting a lack of openness to his perspective.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses frustration with the field's response to criticism.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individual personally.
ย [+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise concerns about the field of AI which could lead to a broader discussion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or a solution to the disagreement.
ย [-1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes within this statement.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The intent to use influence for the betterment of society is implied by the concern for the limitations of AI.
ย [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech, using the platform to express a critical viewpoint responsibly.
ย [+1]