The statement in question is part of a conversation on social media that addresses the potential risks and downsides of advanced AI technology, which is a significant public issue. The original statement by @GaryMarcus expresses concern about the lack of a plan to address the possibility of human extinction due to AI and a loss of confidence in tech leaders. The subsequent replies engage with this viewpoint, either agreeing or presenting a counterargument. The use of the term 'based' in the final reply is colloquial internet slang for agreeing with a well-founded or valid point.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by aligning with a viewpoint rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to engage in a public issue, potentially for the betterment of society by raising awareness of AI risks. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to the public discourse on AI responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.