Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 97
4/8/2024, 2:01:20 PM
X
In reply to:
SaliferousStudios Making animated stories
@SaliferousGames
·
534d
@GaryMarcus Saw they made a movie with sora ai.

Couldn't make a reliable character, so it's a story about a balloon.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
535d
OMG please. You can’t be serious. You think GenAI is better than fire, electricity, agriculture, writing, the printing press, science, medicine, vaccines, sanitation, democracy, and the internet?

Most people could happily live their lives without GenAI. I would certainly…
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
535d
@GaryMarcus There is no tragedy.

Deep learning & GenAI represent the greatest advances in human history.

Eventually, something better will emerge, but it will also have downsides & side effects, this is the nature of technological advancement.

Also this is not about you or any of us…

The statement in question is part of a conversation thread on social media that discusses the impact and significance of General Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and deep learning in comparison to other major human advancements. The tone of the conversation is a mix of serious debate and light-hearted banter. The intent seems to be to engage in a discussion about the role of GenAI in society, with some participants expressing skepticism about its value and others defending its importance. The content touches upon the societal implications of technological advancements, which is a substantive public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses humor to contribute to the discussion, which can be seen as an attempt to promote understanding or lighten the mood of the conversation. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in the dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement contributes to a broader conversation about the impact of technology on society, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, engaging in a public debate with integrity. [+1]