In reply to:
M. Alex O. Vasilescu
@AlexTensor
·
536d
The statement in question is part of a broader public discourse on the development and implications of artificial general intelligence (AGI). It addresses concerns about the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and the standards for determining AGI. The discourse involves critical perspectives on the claims made by influential figures in the AI field, such as Geoffrey Hinton, regarding the intelligence level of current AI systems compared to human intelligence.
- The statement aims to clarify and challenge potentially misleading assertions about AI capabilities, contributing to a more informed public understanding and potentially preventing harm that might arise from misconceptions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by maintaining a focus on the factual and theoretical aspects of AI development, without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By fostering a discussion on the realistic assessment of AI capabilities, the statement promotes understanding and critical thinking among the public and stakeholders. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue encourages constructive criticism and debate over the claims made by AI researchers, which is essential for progress and accountability in the field. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly prompts the involved parties to acknowledge and correct any overstatements or errors in public claims about AI. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The discussion uses its influence to advocate for responsible communication and realistic expectations regarding AI, aligning with the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a public, critical examination of statements made by AI researchers, contributing to a responsible discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.