In reply to:
The_AI_Skeptic
@The_AI_Skeptic
·
537d
Trevor Green
@trevogre
·
538d
The statement acknowledges the imperfection of the term 'hallucinate' in the context of AI and indicates the speaker's past efforts to popularize alternative terms. It also expresses openness to other options, inviting further discussion on the topic.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive discussion on AI terminology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The speaker shows a willingness to engage in dialogue and consider alternative viewpoints. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker acknowledges their role in popularizing the term and their efforts to find a better one, showing a readiness to correct or refine past actions. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The speaker uses their influence to contribute to a nuanced understanding of AI terminology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to the debate responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.