+3
In reply to:
Johnny P
@TheJohnnyp21
·
537d
The statement is part of a conversation about artificial intelligence and its potential to surpass human intelligence. The tone is collaborative, and the intent seems to be to contribute to a discussion about the criteria for defining 'smart' in the context of AI versus human intelligence. The content suggests a willingness to engage in a reasoned debate about the measures of intelligence.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a reasonable approach to defining intelligence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by offering to find common ground on the criteria for intelligence without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.