Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 94

The statement 'Remember kids: If you deeply care about scientific integrity, choose Peer review over PR.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the importance of scientific integrity and the preference for peer-reviewed research over public relations claims. This discussion is relevant in the context of a debate about the validity of scientific claims made by a prominent technology company regarding new material discoveries.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes the idea of scientific integrity, indirectly suggesting that one should avoid causing harm through misinformation or unverified claims. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by advocating for credible scientific practices without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By emphasizing peer review, the statement promotes understanding and trust in scientific processes, fostering empathy towards those who rely on verified information. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the reliance on PR for scientific claims, encouraging dialogue based on verified research rather than promotional content. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by emphasizing the importance of reliable scientific methods. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly advocating for peer review in scientific discourse, using the platform to promote integrity in public communication. [+1]