Gary Marcus

The statement compares classical symbolic software development to the behavior of large language models (LLMs) in terms of fixing and breaking components. It is a technical observation that contributes to a broader discussion about AI model performance and development strategies. The conversation involves a critique of the performance degradation in coding as AI models are further aligned.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm as it is a technical critique. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but discusses technology. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement promotes understanding by contributing to a technical discussion about AI models. [+1]
4. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement is part of a constructive criticism of AI model performance, which is valuable for dialogue. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not acknowledge mistakes as it is not making claims but providing an observation.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss the implications of AI technology development. [+1]