In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
540d
Mark Batson🇺🇸
@MarkBatsonMusic
·
540d
The statement is part of a conversation about the advancement of AI in creative fields and the associated issues with copyright and consent. It is a substantive engagement with a public issue, specifically the impact of AI on intellectual property rights and the ethics surrounding AI-generated content.
- The statement does no harm and raises a legitimate concern about copyright and consent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting a potential problem that could affect many creators. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a flaw in the current state of AI without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight an issue that could lead to societal betterment by ensuring creators' rights are considered. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by contributing to the dialogue on AI and its implications. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.