In reply to:
ihorgowda 🐀
@ihorgowda
·
541d
Brad Hutchings 🍌🐶
@BradHutchings
·
541d
The statement in question is part of a conversation thread on Twitter that appears to be discussing a policy or public issue related to artificial intelligence and free speech. The tone of the statement is somewhat sarcastic, and the intent seems to be to challenge or question the assertions made by another user in the conversation. The content of the statement is a request for evidence to support a claim made in the discussion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but is sarcastic in tone, which could be perceived as slightly negative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society, but it does engage in a policy-related discussion.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a policy-related discussion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.