The statement engages with the issue of climate change by drawing a historical parallel and expressing skepticism about the scientific consensus.
- The statement could indirectly lead to harm by undermining public understanding of climate change. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- Does not promote understanding or compassion regarding climate change. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Lacks constructive criticism or engagement with scientific evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Potentially uses influence irresponsibly by casting doubt on climate change without substantiation. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- Dismisses scientific understanding without reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.