Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement is part of a conversation about the capabilities of General Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and its potential to solve specific tasks by a set date. The tone is analytical and somewhat playful, with the intent to clarify the conditions of a bet regarding the future abilities of AI. The content focuses on the definition of superintelligence in the context of AI's ability to generate legal briefs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding in the context of AI capabilities. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement shows a willingness to refine and correct the terms of the bet, which could be seen as acknowledging a potential oversight. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly uses influence to promote a better understanding of AI, which could contribute to the betterment of society. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]