Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/11/2024, 4:31:20 PM
X
In reply to:
V
@vchamala
·
665d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk I wouldn’t call 44k road deaths in the US alone fabulous
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
665d
@vchamala @elonmusk Statistically we are pretty fabulous, though, if you look at number of miles driven per day
V
@vchamala
·
665d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk Humans cannot relaibly drive cars in a known location. We kill so many every day!!!!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
665d
Apropos my proposed bet with @elonmusk, here are a few things that ordinary skilled people do that I seriously doubt AI will be able to do by the end of 2025:
• Reliably drive a car in a novel location that they haven’t previously encountered, even in face of unusual…

The statement is part of a conversation about the capabilities of AI in driving cars and the current state of road safety. It engages with the public issue of AI technology in vehicles and its implications for road safety, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is informative and the intent is to contribute to the discussion on AI's reliability in driving.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify the difficulty of achieving high accuracy in cognitive systems, implying a concern for safety and harm reduction. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the complexity involved in AI technology for driving, showing empathy for the challenge. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively by providing a perspective on the difficulty of the task without attacking others in the conversation. [+1]