Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
4/11/2024, 6:42:24 PM
X
In reply to:
Suzanne Gildert
@suzannegildert
·
664d
@GaryMarcus @professor_ajay @shivon @bengoertzel @MaxTegmark @RichardSSutton @fuelfive @FutureJurvetson A humanoid robot able to pass a "teleop-based" Turing test - i.e. you can't tell if is is being teleoperated by a person or controlled by AI. I believe we can get there with a behavior-cloning cerebellum forming part of a larger (modular) cognitive architecture.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
664d
@suzannegildert @professor_ajay @shivon @bengoertzel @MaxTegmark @RichardSSutton @fuelfive @FutureJurvetson Doubtful on the latter; what is your criterion on the former?
Suzanne Gildert
@suzannegildert
·
664d
@professor_ajay @shivon @bengoertzel @MaxTegmark @RichardSSutton @fuelfive @GaryMarcus @FutureJurvetson I think we'll have built "philosophical zombie AGI" by 2030 for sure. The more interesting question is, will we have figured out consciousness by then?
Ajay Agrawal
@professor_ajay
·
683d
@shivon: How many years until AGI (in 2015)? @bengoertzel (7) @suzannegildert (by 2025 we'll know whether or not we'll get there by 2030) @MaxTegmark (2045) @RichardSSutton (2040) @fuelfive (2045) @GaryMarcus (2045-2085) @FutureJurvetson (2020 for subhuman)

any panelists care…
Steve Jurvetson
@FutureJurvetson
·
683d
@shivon @professor_ajay @UofT Here you are at the 2017 one, where we covered: What company is most scary in AI? What is most inspiring? Most interesting job in the future? (me: Nursing will be the highest paid job in healthcare) Safest Path to AI? (Sutton: be like Canadians) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ju…

The statement is part of a conversation among professionals discussing the future of artificial general intelligence (AGI), the Turing Test, and the concept of philosophical zombies in the context of AI development. The tone is inquisitive and skeptical, with the intent to contribute to the ongoing debate about the feasibility and implications of creating AGI that can pass the Turing Test and the understanding of consciousness in AI. The content touches upon the challenges and philosophical questions related to AI development and its potential to mimic human behavior and consciousness.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding of a complex issue, though it may not directly promote empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to a better understanding of AI development, which could benefit society by informing the public and professionals in the field. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]