In reply to:
Tony Yates
@t0nyyates
·
663d
The statement is a critical engagement with a claim about the rate of improvement in technology, specifically Large Language Models. It expresses skepticism about the claim and suggests that the claim is difficult to defend, indicating a desire for more precise or substantiated statements in the discourse around technological progress.
- The statement does not cause harm but rather invites further scrutiny and discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the clarity of the claim. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge a mistake but rather challenges the accuracy of another's claim.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to encourage a more nuanced discussion about technological progress. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to the dialogue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.