Gary Marcus

The statement provides a perspective on the ongoing debate about the rate of improvement in LLMs, emphasizing the importance of computational resources over accuracy metrics. It contributes to the dialogue by suggesting that progress in computational efficiency might continue even if accuracy plateaus, thus adding a nuanced view to the discussion.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm and is focused on the technical aspects of LLM development. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not involve personal information. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The tone is neutral and contributes to understanding the nuances of LLM progress. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement encourages a constructive view of the debate by highlighting a different aspect of LLM development. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement is open to correction and further learning, as it is part of an ongoing discussion. [+1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to inform and clarify aspects of LLM development. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by contributing to the debate responsibly. [+1]