The statement is part of a conversation about the impact of various technologies on the world and the economy. It reflects on the discrepancy between the hype surrounding certain technologies and their actual transformative effect on society. The list of technologies mentioned serves to illustrate the point that not all hyped technologies have had a significant impact, and it questions where General AI (GenAI) falls on that spectrum of influence.
- The statement does no harm as it is a neutral assessment of technological impact. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging reflection on the actual impact of technologies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the transformative effect of certain technologies without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to better society by fostering a realistic discussion about technological progress and its implications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.