Jo Evershed @evershedjo.bsky.social
@EvershedJo
·
661d
The statement is critical and poses a rhetorical question about the strategic choices in AI investment, using the Monty Hall problem as a metaphor. It implies skepticism about the current state of AI applications and suggests considering alternative strategies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather invites reflection on investment strategies in AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the effectiveness of current AI applications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not make any factual claims, so there is no need for correction of mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to question the status quo and potentially encourage betterment in AI investment strategies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in responsible discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.