Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
Colin Fraser | @colin-fraser.net on bsky
@colin_fraser
·
659d
Amazing. Perfect.
4/12/2024, 4:34:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Dave Monlander
@DaveMonlander
·
659d
@sumdepony @GaryMarcus Yep. There is a gigantic difference between gpt 3.5 and 4 and it's direct competition.

Biggest issue for practical applicability of gpt4-like models is price.

Other than that, they're god damn smart most of the time.

Lack of transparency plagues these posts by Gary.
Philosophy Bear
@sumdepony
·
659d
@GaryMarcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
659d
Monty Hall problem for the AI industry: Your industry has invested over $50 billion in LLMs, and your best real world use case is the AI Pin.

Should you stay with your strategy, invest $7 trillion more, or try something new?
Jo Evershed @evershedjo.bsky.social
@EvershedJo
·
660d
@IrisVanRooij Here’s a lovely ChatGPT example showing LLMs lack any understanding.

The statement is part of a constructive conversation about AI technology and its practical applicability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement is respectful and does not engage in negative behavior. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive conversation about AI technology. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement contributes to a discussion about technology that could potentially benefit society. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement is an example of responsible use of the platform to express an opinion. [+1]