Jake Tapper

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 70

The statement reports on an incident where a Jewish dean's student dinner was disrupted by a speech related to Gaza. The content of the statement is factual, describing the nature of the event and indicating that further details can be found in the video linked. The tone is neutral, and the intent is to inform the public about the incident and provide access to more detailed coverage.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement reports on a disruptive event without advocating harm or using harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not providing unnecessary personal details or engaging in sensationalism. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement itself does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide information that could lead to a more informed public discourse.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is a factual report, and as such, it does not appear to contain any personal opinions or errors that would require correction. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform of a news outlet to inform the public, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by keeping citizens informed. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by reporting on an event that involved a speech, without taking a stance on the content of the speech itself. [+1]