Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
amit kumar
@kumar_amit
·
658d
Is Google's AI Actually Discovering 'Millions of New Materials?' ⁦@GaryMarcus⁩ — I thought we were going to leap frog in material science because of AI 😀 ⁦@molly0xFFF⁩ https://www.404media.co/google-s…
4/12/2024, 12:40:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
658d
@DeryaTR_ I do. But lots has to change first:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
659d
Absolutely! There is still hope for building a positive AI future!

But at least three things have to change:
• We need a better, more reliable, more trustworthy technical approach (which will probably require a paradigm shift)
- The big AI companies have to stop ripping off…
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
658d
@GaryMarcus AI today is akin to the internet in 1994; it was poised to impact society, the economy, & everything else, but it took few years to realize its potential. First AI & then with robotics, will likely take less time to achieve much bigger impact. Surprised that you don't see that…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
659d
Many technologies have been heralded as world-changing; not all of them have been (thus far)
• jet packs
• flying cars
• driverless cars
• expert systems
• blockchain
• NFTs
• Google Glass
• VR/AR/Metaverse
Etc.

Where GenAI falls in the continuum between NFTs and the…
Timothy B. Lee
@binarybits
·
659d
The last year has been a lot of cognitive dissonance for me. Inside the AI world, there's non-stop talk about the unprecedented pace of AI improvement. But when I look at the broader economy, I struggle to find examples of transformative change I can write about.

The statement is part of a conversation about the impact and promises of AI technology, which is a topic of public interest and debate. The tone seems to be critical, and the intent is to point out the discrepancy between promises and actual achievements in AI. The content refers to broken promises regarding current AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but is critical in nature. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader discussion on AI.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not attack any individual personally. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of a mistake being made or corrected.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement contributes to a discussion on AI, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and seems responsible and with integrity. [+1]