In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
658d
The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter regarding the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and approaches to developing trustworthy AI systems. It involves a discussion of technical approaches and the direction of AI research, which is a matter of public interest and contributes to the broader dialogue on technology and society. The tone is informative and engages with the topic substantively, intending to propose alternatives to current AI development practices.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses words to promote understanding of AI development challenges. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to guide AI development towards a betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.