In reply to:
Vishnu
@vishivishx
·
657d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
657d
The statement is part of a conversation about the development and funding of AI technology, which is a public issue. The tone is critical but constructive, aiming to engage in a debate about the best approach to AI acceleration and the role of regulation in technology. The content addresses the disagreement with a public figure's perspective on AI development and suggests an alternative viewpoint that regulation can be beneficial.
- The statement aims to engage in a debate without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, without engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering an alternative viewpoint on AI development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to discuss the betterment of AI technology for society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.