Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
4/12/2024, 2:42:37 PM
X
In reply to:
Roland Fernandez
@rolandalong
·
656d
@GaryMarcus Beware- the bitter lesson lies in waiting!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
656d
The only plausible approach to trustworthy AI I know:
• Neurosymbolic hybrid AI
• Large-scale knowledge, with an innate core
• Better reasoning
• Explicit, dynamically updatable cognitive models
Vishnu
@vishivishx
·
657d
@GaryMarcus .@GaryMarcus what do you think is the most promising alternative approach that will allow AI to scale to true intelligence, instead of this Transformer-based Autoregressive Next-token prediction, which seems more akin to just curve-fitting over all the text on the internet?

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter regarding approaches to artificial intelligence (AI) and its future development. The tone is informative and anticipatory, as the user expresses an intent to explain their perspective on a concept known as 'the bitter lesson' in AI. The content is a promise of future engagement in a substantive debate about AI methodologies and their implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement intends to share information in the future, implying a commitment to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The promise to explain a concept suggests an intent to promote understanding and potentially empathy and compassion for differing views on AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user's statement sets the stage for future constructive criticism and dialogue, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user's intent to explain a concept related to AI indicates a desire to use influence for the betterment of society by contributing to a significant technological debate. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The user is upholding the principles of free speech by planning to use their platform to engage responsibly in a public discourse on AI. [+1]