The statement is a critical response to DHS's funding decision, using charged language that may not promote constructive dialogue.
- The statement uses language that could be harmful by framing migrants negatively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The term 'mass invasion' does not respect the dignity of migrants and could be seen as a form of dehumanization. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or compassion towards migrants. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement is a form of criticism, the language used may not be conducive to constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The use of charged language may not be a responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.