Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
4/12/2024, 9:29:40 PM
X
In reply to:
CoolPineapple ∞ 8
@CoolPineapple18
·
653d
A lot to agree with here. The only thing I take issue with is the assumption that the AGI must *reason over internal* models of the external world. It could also *use external* models of the external world. (In an Otto's notebook sense).
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
654d
Discussed more here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06177

The statement '@CoolPineapple18 Yes to some degree, but not sufficient' is a part of a larger conversation about artificial intelligence and its development. The tone is neutral and the intent seems to be to contribute to the discussion by providing a brief opinion on the topic. The content, while not detailed, suggests agreement with a previous statement with a caveat that it is not entirely sufficient.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm with words and actions, as it is a neutral contribution to the discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding, although it is brief and does not provide much detail for empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by agreeing to some extent but also suggesting that the point made is not sufficient, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]