Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about artificial intelligence (AI) policy, which is a significant public issue. The tone is hopeful and constructive, suggesting a desire for effective governance in AI innovation. The intent is to encourage a political figure and his team to consider expert opinions on the relationship between AI innovation and governance.
- The statement aims to do no harm and is focused on policy advocacy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of governance in AI innovation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting that effective governance is necessary for innovation, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for better AI policy, which could benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by participating in a public policy discussion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.