The statement is critical of Republican actions regarding the late fee rule, suggesting a motive to protect corporate profits over consumer interests. It provides a link to an article for further context.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but it does use charged language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise awareness about a consumer protection issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on ad hominem by suggesting Republicans' motives without engaging in dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to share a perspective on a public policy responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.