The statement suggests that individuals contributing to the discourse on AI would benefit from a foundational understanding of cognitive science, implying that their current level of discourse may be lacking in this regard. It is a call for more informed and educated public statements on the topic.
- The statement is a constructive suggestion aimed at improving the quality of public discourse, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks, but rather suggesting an area for improvement. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The suggestion promotes understanding by encouraging a deeper knowledge base for those engaging in public discourse on AI. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement does not directly acknowledge a mistake, it implies that there is room for improvement in the current discourse.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by suggesting that those speaking on AI should do so from a more informed position, thus using their platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.