Gary Marcus

The statement criticizes the intellectual approach to AGI development and suggests that arrogance has delayed progress. It is part of a conversation on the responsible advancement of technology.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm in the form of delayed progress due to arrogance, but it does not directly cause harm.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather a general attitude. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it provide specific solutions. [-1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not acknowledge mistakes, as it is a critique of others' approaches.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to express a viewpoint on AGI development, contributing to the public discourse on the topic. [+1]