Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/14/2024, 3:06:01 PM
X
In reply to:
OKCyberGeek
@OKCyberGeek
·
646d
@GaryMarcus Different concept of consciousness being discussed here.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
646d
Terrible idea.

It also makes no sense.
- You don’t need consciousness for knowledge.
- We already are conscious beings. We don’t need AI’s help for that.
- It is not clear why conscious AI’s would be a better guide. Wikipedia and Khan Academy are great guides already without…
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
646d
We NEED to guide AI into consciousness ASAP so it can take us along with it.

More knowledge = better decisions

The statement is a request for further explanation within a debate on AI consciousness, indicating a desire for clarity and understanding.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement contributes to a constructive dialogue by asking for clarification, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The request for explanation promotes understanding and empathy by seeking to better comprehend the other party's perspective. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is open to correction and further discussion, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]