Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
4/14/2024, 3:35:16 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
645d
@GaryMarcus But I did listen to the short clip, I think they are talking about something else. More like @drmichaellevin light cone of care.
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
645d
@GaryMarcus Yes, I agree with you here. Human-like consciousness for an artificial intelligence can be problematic.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
645d
Terrible idea.

It also makes no sense.
- You don’t need consciousness for knowledge.
- We already are conscious beings. We don’t need AI’s help for that.
- It is not clear why conscious AI’s would be a better guide. Wikipedia and Khan Academy are great guides already without…
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
645d
We NEED to guide AI into consciousness ASAP so it can take us along with it.

More knowledge = better decisions

The statement is part of a public discourse on the ethics and implications of creating conscious AI. It emphasizes the need for careful consideration in such discussions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement calls for careful consideration, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly address understanding, empathy, or compassion, but implies a responsible approach.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement provides constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement suggests a responsible use of platform in discussing sensitive topics. [+1]