Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse on the evaluation of LLMs and expresses frustration with the conversation's current direction, suggesting that the issues have been addressed in a Substack article.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm but expresses frustration.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not violate privacy or dignity.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement could be seen as constructive by redirecting to a source that addresses the issues. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not directly address this principle.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement contributes to the ongoing conversation, supporting free speech. [+1]