In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
644d
The statement is part of a conversation clarifying historical facts about the development of AI and the intentions of the Dartmouth Summer School proposal. It is informational and corrective in nature, aiming to address inaccuracies in a previous statement about AI history.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying historical facts without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While not correcting the speaker's own mistake, the statement contributes to the correction of mistakes in the public discourse on AI history. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.