In reply to:
J. Ryan Briggs
@jettbriggs
·
642d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
642d
The statement '@jettbriggs Which requires transparency.' is a part of a conversation about the evaluation of software, specifically in the context of autonomous vehicles or AI systems. The statement emphasizes the need for transparency in the evaluation process of such technologies.
- The statement promotes the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency, which can lead to safer and more reliable technology deployments. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by supporting a process that ensures technologies are trustworthy and their impacts are well understood, protecting users and the public. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The call for transparency fosters understanding and informed discussion about AI technologies, contributing to a more educated public. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for better practices in technology evaluation, aiming for societal betterment through safer AI systems. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.