Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement provides a perspective on the statistical significance of failure rates in the context of self-driving cars. It suggests that even a small percentage of failure can lead to significant problems when scaled to a large number of vehicles.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement acknowledges the potential harm that could arise from a small failure rate in a large fleet of self-driving cars, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individuals but rather discusses the technology in general terms. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of considering the broader implications of technology failures, even when they occur at a low rate. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to caution against complacency regarding the safety of self-driving cars, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging critical evaluation of new technologies. [+1]