Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses the impact of content moderation on historical education and memory, raising awareness and inviting dialogue on the matter.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by ensuring that historical education is not hindered by content moderation policies. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the individuals remembered in the flagged posts. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for those affected by historical atrocities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement constructively criticizes Facebook's actions and invites dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly calls for the correction of a mistake in content moderation. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement advocates for the betterment of society through historical education. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement defends the responsible use of free speech in the context of historical remembrance. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.