Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is critical of the use of generative AI as educators, citing cognitive scientist Gary Marcus to support the argument. It is part of a broader conversation about the effectiveness of personalized learning and AI in education.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to caution against potential educational pitfalls. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the limitations of AI in education. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI in education without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to discuss the betterment of educational practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.