The statement is a critique of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their effectiveness, comparing them to a recent financial scandal (FTX) and labeling them as a 'con.' The tone is dismissive and critical, and the intent is to discredit the value of LLMs in the field of artificial intelligence. The content references opinions of notable figures in the AI community and links to an article discussing an alternative approach to AI proposed by Yann LeCun.
- The statement uses harsh language that could be seen as harmful to those who work on or support LLMs. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses an entire field of study rather than seeking common ground or understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism that could be construed as non-constructive, as it labels LLMs as a 'con' without engaging in a dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of an acknowledgment or correction of mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society but rather to discredit a field of study. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the accusatory language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.