Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/15/2024, 7:36:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Nisarg Patel
@Nisarg2711
·
638d
@IntuitMachine @GaryMarcus But Sam altman said the opposite! What should I believe 🤔
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
638d
@GaryMarcus Thank you for making your stance crystal clear.

I will argue the opposite.

AGI is here and LLMs got us here.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
639d
Nobody said LLMs weren’t useful.

We said they aren’t AGI.

LeCun and I are both right about that. Time will bear that out.
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
639d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun It's an interesting coincidence that you are both aligned and wrong at the same time. LLMs are a kind of AI that may not be humanlike, but is extremely capable and useful.

The statement is part of a conversation on social media about the effectiveness and future of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the field of artificial intelligence. It involves a discussion on the opinions of various experts in the field, including Sam Altman and Gary Marcus, and their views on whether LLMs constitute Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The tone is informative and contributes to the ongoing debate about the nature and potential of LLMs in AI development. The intent is to clarify the positions of different thought leaders on the subject and to engage in the broader conversation about the direction of AI research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to the understanding of the differing opinions on LLMs and AGI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by referencing the opinions of experts without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of any mistakes made that need to be acknowledged or corrected.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to the discussion on AI, which could be seen as bettering society by fostering informed debate. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing opinions and information responsibly. [+1]